Lean Too

Green Home Assessment: Energy and Water Audit of your home

November 23, 2009 · 1 Comment

Get a FREE Green Home Assessment!
Tenants or Home owners, become eligible for a $10 000 Interest Free Green Loan.
I have started assessing houses and am sub- contracted by the Federal Government to do so.

A new Federal Government initiative to tackle climate change.  A comprehensive energy and water audit of your home that benefits your comfort, your pocket and the environment. Find out where you can make easy savings around the house or create a plan for ecoretrofitting your property.
The assessment makes you eligible for a $10 000 Interest Free Green Loan to implement any of the recommended changes listed in the report. From weather stripping, new star rated appliances and window shading to water tanks and solar panels.

Tenants or home owners are welcome, the assessment taking up to 90 minutes; providing insight into your homes efficiency and how to take simple steps to make it more so.
With water a scarce resource, electricity prices set to double in the next year and extreme heat waves there couldn’t be a better time to take advantage of this free service.
For more information go to http://www.environment.gov.au/greenloans.
Call me or respond to this email with your preferred time and contact details to book an appointment today.

Philippa Abbott
0406 236 112
philippa_abbott@hotmail.com
www.leantoo.wordpress.com

HSA#: HO50230
Accredited Home Sustainability Assessor: Ecomaster Gisborne
Bachelor of Industrial Design: RMIT Melbourne

→ 1 CommentCategories: Ecoretrofit
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hunt for Bioresins Part 2

June 12, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Okay, so have contacted a couple of suppliers hwoever it does seem like I will be offsetting that kilo package of goodness (at 40 quid a pop) as it gets shipped to its Antipoedes.  It looks great though, am really excited.  Canonbury Arts Shop in Islington,London may be the winner.

http://www.canonburyarts.co.uk/index.html

I found an Australian jewellery maker Loop http://www.loopdesign.com.au who use bioresins so have contacted them to hopefully find a closer manufacturer.  There stuff is beautiful have a look.http://www.loopdesign.com.au/products.asp

I was then thinking that could create the mould out of resin too (rather than silicon) and display the product as a twin set (vessel and ornament).  However you would loose the flexibility of shape (overhangs etc) that can get with silicon.

Interstingly, I then started looked for a biodegradeable silicon for mould making.  And have ended up on a goose chase into the land of pharmeceuticals…. so I may use there little medicine giving nanotechnology as a silicon that breaks down into silica… that is if you eat it. hehe, a world of weird design possibilities! You have your furniture and when you get sick of it you chop it up and eat it… kind of like tofu…hahahahaha.

Have a looksie at this link.  http://www.psivida.com/about/bio_presentation.asp

I am guessing that the process of creating is rather energy intensive.

I am guessing it would be crazily expensive however amazing what those little nanos are up to these days! I like the idea of crossing borders of medicinal science and art/design.

There is another avenue of manipulating process – the mould maker rather than trying to use the existing process with new and better material.

So a water fill up mould with a skin – gravity may be a little too prevalent…

This article is interesting about mimicking sea sponges to create a silicon structure for efficient energy/engineering.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/17726/

Maybe using food stuffs to create a mould?  Jelly? ooooooooo, that will be fun.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Technology · ecodesign · objects
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Inspiring speech about environmental responsibility

June 7, 2009 · 3 Comments

Healing or Stealing, a speech by Paul Hawken given earlier this year as a Commencement Day Address to Class of 2009 students at University of Portland LIVE
“When I was invited to give this speech, I was asked if I could give a simple short talk that was “direct, naked, taut, honest, passionate, lean, shivering, startling, and graceful.” No pressure there.

Let’s begin with the startling part. Class of 2009: you are going to have to figure out what it means to be a human being on earth at a time when every living system is declining, and the rate of decline is accelerating. Kind of a mind-boggling situation… but not one peer-reviewed paper published in the last thirty years can refute that statement. Basically, civilization needs a new operating system, you are the programmers, and we need it within a few decades.

This planet came with a set of instructions, but we seem to have misplaced them. Important rules like don’t poison the water, soil, or air, don’t let the earth get overcrowded, and don’t touch the thermostat have been broken. Buckminster Fuller said that spaceship earth was so ingeniously designed that no one has a clue that we are on one, flying through the universe at a million miles per hour, with no need for seatbelts, lots of room in coach, and really good food—but all that is changing.

There is invisible writing on the back of the diploma you will receive, and in case you didn’t bring lemon juice to decode it, I can tell you what it says: You are Brilliant, and the Earth is Hiring. The earth couldn’t afford to send recruiters or limos to your school. It sent you rain, sunsets, ripe cherries, night blooming jasmine, and that unbelievably cute person you are dating. Take the hint. And here’s the deal: Forget that this task of planet-saving is not possible in the time required. Don’t be put off by people who know what is not possible. Do what needs to be done, and check to see if it was impossible only after you are done.

When asked if I am pessimistic or optimistic about the future, my answer is always the same: If you look at the science about what is happening on earth and aren’t pessimistic, you don’t understand the data. But if you meet the people who are working to restore this earth and the lives of the poor, and you aren’t optimistic, you haven’t got a pulse. What I see everywhere in the world are ordinary people willing to confront despair, power, and incalculable odds in order to restore some semblance of grace, justice, and beauty to this world. The poet Adrienne Rich wrote, “So much has been destroyed I have cast my lot with those who, age after age, perversely, with no extraordinary power, reconstitute the world.” There could be no better description. Humanity is coalescing. It is reconstituting the world, and the action is taking place in schoolrooms, farms, jungles, villages, campuses, companies, refuge camps, deserts, fisheries, and slums.

You join a multitude of caring people. No one knows how many groups and organizations are working on the most salient issues of our day: climate change, poverty, deforestation, peace, water, hunger, conservation, human rights, and more. This is the largest movement the world has ever seen. Rather than control, it seeks connection. Rather than dominance, it strives to disperse concentrations of power. Like Mercy Corps, it works behind the scenes and gets the job done. Large as it is, no one knows the true size of this movement. It provides hope, support, and meaning to billions of people in the world. Its clout resides in idea, not in force. It is made up of teachers, children, peasants, businesspeople, rappers, organic farmers, nuns, artists, government workers, fisherfolk, engineers, students, incorrigible writers, weeping Muslims, concerned mothers, poets, doctors without borders, grieving Christians, street musicians, the President of the United States of America, and as the writer David James Duncan would say, the Creator, the One who loves us all in such a huge way.

There is a rabbinical teaching that says if the world is ending and the Messiah arrives, first plant a tree, and then see if the story is true. Inspiration is not garnered from the litanies of what may befall us; it resides in humanity’s willingness to restore, redress, reform, rebuild, recover, reimagine, and reconsider. “One day you finally knew what you had to do, and began, though the voices around you kept shouting their bad advice,” is Mary Oliver’s description of moving away from the profane toward a deep sense of connectedness to the living world.

Millions of people are working on behalf of strangers, even if the evening news is usually about the death of strangers. This kindness of strangers has religious, even mythic origins, and very specific eighteenth-century roots. Abolitionists were the first people to create a national and global movement to defend the rights of those they did not know. Until that time, no group had filed a grievance except on behalf of itself. The founders of this movement were largely unknown — Granville Clark, Thomas Clarkson, Josiah Wedgwood — and their goal was ridiculous on the face of it: at that time three out of four people in the world were enslaved. Enslaving each other was what human beings had done for ages. And the abolitionist movement was greeted with incredulity. Conservative spokesmen ridiculed the abolitionists as liberals, progressives, do-gooders, meddlers, and activists. They were told they would ruin the economy and drive England into poverty. But for the first time in history a group of people organized themselves to help people they would never know, from whom they would never receive direct or indirect benefit. And today tens of millions of people do this every day. It is called the world of non-profits, civil society, schools, social entrepreneurship, non-governmental organizations, and companies who place social and environmental justice at the top of their strategic goals. The scope and scale of this effort is unparalleled in history.

The living world is not “out there” somewhere, but in your heart. What do we know about life? In the words of biologist Janine Benyus, life creates the conditions that are conducive to life. I can think of no better motto for a future economy. We have tens of thousands of abandoned homes without people and tens of thousands of abandoned people without homes. We have failed bankers advising failed regulators on how to save failed assets. We are the only species on the planet without full employment. Brilliant. We have an economy that tells us that it is cheaper to destroy earth in real time rather than renew, restore, and sustain it. You can print money to bail out a bank but you can’t print life to bail out a planet. At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product. We can just as easily have an economy that is based on healing the future instead of stealing it. We can either create assets for the future or take the assets of the future. One is called restoration and the other exploitation. And whenever we exploit the earth we exploit people and cause untold suffering. Working for the earth is not a way to get rich, it is a way to be rich.

The first living cell came into being nearly 40 million centuries ago, and its direct descendants are in all of our bloodstreams. Literally you are breathing molecules this very second that were inhaled by Moses, Mother Teresa, and Bono. We are vastly interconnected. Our fates are inseparable. We are here because the dream of every cell is to become two cells. And dreams come true. In each of you are one quadrillion cells, 90 percent of which are not human cells. Your body is a community, and without those other microorganisms you would perish in hours. Each human cell has 400 billion molecules conducting millions of processes between trillions of atoms. The total cellular activity in one human body is staggering: one septillion actions at any one moment, a one with twenty-four zeros after it. In a millisecond, our body has undergone ten times more processes than there are stars in the universe, which is exactly what Charles Darwin foretold when he said science would discover that each living creature was a “little universe, formed of a host of self-propagating organisms, inconceivably minute and as numerous as the stars of heaven.”

So I have two questions for you all: First, can you feel your body? Stop for a moment. Feel your body. One septillion activities going on simultaneously, and your body does this so well you are free to ignore it, and wonder instead when this speech will end. You can feel it. It is called life. This is who you are. Second question: who is in charge of your body? Who is managing those molecules? Hopefully not a political party. Life is creating the conditions that are conducive to life inside you, just as in all of nature. Our innate nature is to create the conditions that are conducive to life. What I want you to imagine is that collectively humanity is evincing a deep innate wisdom in coming together to heal the wounds and insults of the past.

Ralph Waldo Emerson once asked what we would do if the stars only came out once every thousand years. No one would sleep that night, of course. The world would create new religions overnight. We would be ecstatic, delirious, made rapturous by the glory of God. Instead, the stars come out every night and we watch television.

This extraordinary time when we are globally aware of each other and the multiple dangers that threaten civilization has never happened, not in a thousand years, not in ten thousand years. Each of us is as complex and beautiful as all the stars in the universe. We have done great things and we have gone way off course in terms of honouring creation. You are graduating to the most amazing, stupefying challenge ever bequested to any generation. The generations before you failed. They didn’t stay up all night. They got distracted and lost sight of the fact that life is a miracle every moment of your existence. Nature beckons you to be on her side. You couldn’t ask for a better boss. The most unrealistic person in the world is the cynic, not the dreamer. Hope only makes sense when it doesn’t make sense to be hopeful. This is your century. Take it and run as if your life depends on it.”

Deborah Hart | +33 6 21 93 21 06 | Skype: deborah.hart22 | Campaigner, LIVE http://www.live.org.au/

→ 3 CommentsCategories: Social Innovation
Tagged: , , , , ,

After Use: My Household waste cycle

May 22, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This is research for of the series of objects I am designing that engage with sustainable consumerism.  I am exploring waste for materials to use to create a composite structural material for an element of my living room (bookshelf or table or tv cabinet).    I am targeting materials that are least reused/recycled: the waste of the waste – what ends up in landfill/litter and why.  27% of landfill is municipal waste, 30-40% is food waste.  A majority is packaging (bags, cling wrap, wrappers)or else this ends up in the ocean (46 000 pieces/mile 2) or as litter (32% of Clean Up Australia litter in 2007).

I have created a flow chart of Melbourne household waste, and have categorised it according to before use-waste and after-use waste.  Which can be thought of as production and household waste.  This does not target the energy intensiveness or polluting capacity of creation/transport/recycling processes.

I also photographed my own houses waste levels to create the flow chart and to explore materials for waste craft. I put out my rubbish once every two weeks and this is the amount after 12 days, I usually eat two meals at home a day.

I was surprised at how little recycling 2 people created in 12 days.  I guess I buy meat from the deli and do not use plastic bags for vegies.  Drink lots of hot drinks, (tea, dandelion and herbal) which is reflected in milk consumption.  Do get the paper everyday which adds up. This does not include the bathroom or studio bin which fills up over … months.

The kitchen rubbish in the bin is stuff deemed “soiled”.  Been in contact with meat or liquid. This is basically glad wrap, plastic bags and individual cat portions – my cat is a snob and will only eat kanga.  I am reusing the shopping bags as bagliners however do have to consider that these will also end up in landfill – they can be recycled by supermarkets however the way up of then buying another product to use instead, i don’t know how successful green bags really are, they are plastic fibres, imported and end up in the landfill more often then not.  Should really look into biodegradeable binliners.  Consumption amount is less than expected. One and a half bags for 2 weeks is pretty good.

Food waste happily decomposing and getting munched on.

This is the rubbish left over, the plastics that are not accepted by the council recycling or had no recycling information.  Felt like a bit of chocolate lately! Technically they are recycleable it is just that due to the additives and difficulty in sorting, seperating etc that they are not.  These end up in litter or landfill. I took two photos of compressed and free! Interested in creating a thermoset composite with the packaging, it would basically act as structural filler so is not remelted or any thing however tightly compressed.

I could use alot of the binned plastic by cleaning it.  This would mean my house would be zero solid daily waste. Actually would have to incorporate my bathroom and study.

Again the theme that keeps baffling me is this whole time of material life (plastics 5 – 5 000 years) versus time of funtion/utility.  Why the fuck do we use plastics that keep on going for a use of ripping it off and chucking it?  Even the relative time line of transport of goods and keeping it fresh still is tiny comparible to the material life expectancy. DUMB!

Why? Because packaging as function again is tiny in comparison to its functionality as branding.  It is bright and enticing, it gives space for a name. I wonder what I could design that is 5000 years of function, what is that timeless? Fossils.  Pyramids.  Rocks.  Archeological artefact – Scribe.

Think about a banana.  It’s packaging, the ole skin is  deliberately and beautifully a protectant then as time passes an indicator of it’s inedibility.  It lasts for human consumption just that little bit longer than the insides then they help each other degrade and become food for another little beastie.  Yup.  Go nature.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Design & Everyday life · Technology · Visual Sociology
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ecodesign Material Resources

May 16, 2009 · Leave a Comment

URE CHAIR by Cohda

This is a great manual for sustainable design, have a look – very helpful as gives well rounded overview.
D4S – Design for Sustainability

This website talks about ecodesign and how to choose materials wisely for cost as well as green benefit.  Rules being:
Reduce amount of material used
Reduce the number of materials being used
Use materials with less impact.
Eco Smes – Eco-design and EEE: Materials

The IDSA ecodesign website is a great cluster of tools and links which provide a support network for practicing designers. There is:
1) news, inspiration and infrastructure section,
2)professions and comps
3)strategies and methods.
4)materials
Is amazing, get into it.


IDSA Ecodesign

If you go to wikipedia “lifecycle assessemnt” surprising well rounded explanation of LCA and many links beyond.

Life cycle assessment – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And for me active within Australia have a look at, particularly pages on history and methodology

Introduction to LCA | Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society

Lounge Daddy No.2

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Technology · ecodesign · objects
Tagged: , , , , ,

what is good design….?

May 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

A while back I posted Deiter Ram’s 10 Commandments of good design.  Liam then suggested I define what I see is as good design, a weee vocational mandala!  I thought this was a splendid idea (so did my ego) to clear the confusion of how I perceive my project and how I am going to construct the deliverables.

This is going to be an ever changing lil philosophical on this blogit so will update and change round. Please shout at me if you think it is pure lunacy or maybe just egotistical or plain dumb… or just boring… or anything else.

Good design is a creative response to a defined problem.

Good design is facilitation of people’s needs and desires.

Good design is innovative with conscious – just cos it’s new doesn’t make it good.

Good design is pleasurable.

Good design is useful.

Good design communicates its purpose.

Good design is ecologically frugal – in production & use.

Good design is socially thoughtful.

Good design is reached through understanding & insight.

Good design insights.

Good design incites.

Good design inspires.

Good design engages on many different levels.

Good design creates no waste.

Good design is cyclic in material use and process­.

Good design is beautiful in its implications as well as it’s form.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Cultural Comment · Design & Everyday life · Social Innovation
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

The hunt for bioresin

May 6, 2009 · Leave a Comment

resin-casteSo went to sources some lovely bio-degradeable non harmful resin the other day.   Was told that this was not possible in this land called Oz.  It must be imported… defeating my purpose of little lovely eco-product if needs 5o billion tonnes of fossil fuel for it to arrive at my demanding little doorstep.  So I shalt keep hunting.  Why do I dislike these transparent moulded clusters of petrochemicals?  They are the culmination of what is wrong with plastics, toxic little buggers.  And the sheer abundance of manufacture is astounding, polyethelene resin us used for most packaging which is a whole lot of nasty as it is the most disposable, and least recycleable.  Polyurethane (as seen above) is used in different grading for foam in bedding and cushions, low density foam, gel rollers, and hard solid plastics for strucutral parts.  As well as artisitc resin.

The manufacturing process to create resin is highly carbon intensive, fuel intensive, produces toxic biproducts, and creates air and water pollution. 4% of the world’s oil use is in creating plastic [bagshttp://www.islandnet.com/~vipirg/publications/pubs/student_papers/05_ecofootprint_plastic_bags.pdf].  See the little blue plastic feet or clear punching hand bobbing around the ocean for an unsuspecting dolphin to nibble on, then for it to get stuck in it’s colon.  Then what? dead dolphin biodegrades.  Blue foot doesn’t.  Blue foot precedes to get stuck in other colons, leaching toxins into land or sea for the next million years. ”Over time it goes through a process of photo degradation and breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces” – however it does not decompose so the colon and the bioaccumulation just gets smaller and smaller.  The blue foot is more commonly known as the plastic bag, tupperware, packaging, etc.  

resins-barnes

I hear myself ask, is this just another material added to all the others – does it really matter? so what if there a small particles of itsy bitsy plastic mixed in with soil, or floating around in the ocean.

 Well yes it does matter. why? There is nothing naturally occuring that takes that long to break down in that global amount, it throws out the ole environmental budget as there is a whole lot of waste building up.  Have a look at the gyro islands of crap in the ocean.  MEGA!  Ecologically systems work because all biproducts of a reaction become the input/fuel/food to another player in the ecological world whether it be microorganism, plant, dolphin or human.  Plastics don’t.   They bioaccumulate in animals.  Besides photosynthesis, they continue as is, leeching toxins into their environment.    To give an example of toxins and timeframes, bottled water PET is a health risk to drink from after a month.  It starts leeching toxins into its enviornment – which in this case is water ingested by you so your body. Some plastics cannot be recycled, others can however it is still inherently problematic to do so.  The materials we so commonly use in daily practice have life expectancies well beyond the use we are using them for.  

Back to resins! this tirade is of design interest & inspiration. I have been searching for bioresins to use to caste a bone scuplture in.  This is inspired by East African jewellery where cow bone is caste in resin to make some very beautiful jewellery for form and for process and use of surrounding materials. These were made from naturally occuring resins.   However the manufactured bioresins still seem pretty sordid.  They do not break down in your backyard or landfill in a year or so, it seems with polyethelene anyway they need special industrial treatment to do so…. seems a little off the mark to me.  In terms of my bone and resin sculpture, i might use horrible toxic shit in the hope that it does last forever and archive a little human piece…. ahhh the hypocrisy of the modern age.

butterfly-in-resinIts funny trying to imagine little aliens coming to earth in a million years, no life left however a sea of partly recognisable (to the human eye) rubbish.  Where we forage for archeological samples of cultures before, these will be in abundance for our alien future friends.  They may have to forage for any sign of organic life that may have created this chaotic mess of different size fragments of our age.  The erosion caused by our large and productive machines drilling the earth for fuel, the salination of the planet could erode at an accelerate rate all the rest to disfugure the planets face so that fossillisation is incredibly rare.   To such an extent that the alien may scratch its pre-verbial head.

Well that turned into a rant.

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Products · Technology · objects
Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

Interview with Ralph Horne, Director Centre for Design.

May 4, 2009 · Leave a Comment

urban-desnityOn Tuesday 28th April I met with Ralph Horne, Director of the Centre for Design to discuss sustainability, the designer’s role, innovation, lifecycle assessment and material innovation.   

I first introduced that my Industrial Design major project is exploring sustainable consumerism through creating a series of objects.  This is divided into two areas: 1) Technology and Communication, which covers material innovation, lifecycle assessment and technology.  2) Cultural Practice & Visual Sociology, that is storytelling through objects in the living room.  It is an investigation into the nature of object associations within the home and how we can realign these associations.

FOLLOW THE LINKS BELOW TO HEAR THE INTERVIEW IN FIVE PARTS.

1. Where do you see changing attitudes towards sustainability as being inherent to a sustainable future and how do you see that working? [11:46]

Ralph Horne 1: Object Associations

2. So what can a designer do? [5:14]

Ralph Horne 2: Designers Rolehongkongdensity

3.How do you envision a green future? If you could respond to this quote:

 “how can humankind escape this vicious cycle in which its unlimited appetite devours the world on which its life depends”. [7:56]

Ralph Horne 3: A Green Future

4. When it comes to Lifecycle Assesssment could you explain the best approach and the differences between them? [10:15]

Ralph Horne 4: Lifecycle Assessment

5. Is material innovation in Australia good? [3.40]

Ralph Horne 5: Material Innovation

If you follow the link below it will take you to a written summary.

http://issuu.com/philippaabbott/docs/summary_ralph_horne

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Design & Everyday life · Ecoretrofit · objects
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Modern Colonialist… Queensland bridge starts its new life as a stool

April 24, 2009 · 1 Comment

So I am nearly finished my modern colonialist stool. I am really happy with it. It is slightly different than I initially designed it.  Leaving a gap of a year and a half between getting the timber to the finishing touches may create a little warpage in a 160year old piece of spotted gum (and who knows how long it lived for) from a far north queensland bridge.  I was amazed at the quality of the timber when it had been in the elements and used as structural support for over a century.  This beautiful wood was an inch or so underneath the old and cracked surface.Milling the top of the stool

I called it the ‘modern colonialist’  because of the old world settling associations of the material’s journey and it’s reformation as 21st century furniture.  The inspiration for the design were the shape of a Chippendale ball and claw dining room chair leg.  I  liked the idea of creating a contemporary counterpart with stark edges that harked back to these antiques and the aesthetic of tapering legs with the ‘ball’ protruding out from the bottom of the seat.

Profile of leg and topSquaring up the cross pieces with the legs

The major aesthetic change of the final object is in the top piece because of warpage of the wood due to sitting without oil or any protective coating for a year.   A consequence of this is the top piece of timber is a lot smaller in radius (approximately 15mm) than I envisioned it.  It is an ornamental piece and so this is of no concern for the bum size of a sitter. The smaller radius has brought the legs closer together which creates a curious visual impact.  Only the inner side  of the legs four faces are perpendicular to the top so the narrowing to the feet is emphasised further by the small diameter of the top.  The sharp lines of the form contrast with the textuality of the timber’s spirally pattern through the grain – which I love.

I have really enjoyed working with this wood, it really is beautiful timber and the association as reused with this whole story behind it of a previous existence adds intersting and special connection for me in creating a form driven object.  Thanks to the guys at ecotimber for giving me the wood and their considered advice at the start of the process. www.ecotimbergroup.com.au .  And of course thanks paul! this would otherwise still be a sketch and a length of timber…

→ 1 CommentCategories: objects

Design Anthropology

April 18, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Dr. Elizabeth ‘Dori’ Tunstall presented at the Design Victoria seminar, ‘The Human Side of Design – How design anthropology adds value’, in August 2008.  This started me on better udnerstanding what design anthropology is.

Basically design anthropology (or anthrodesign)  “tries to combine making sense of what is there with remaking what is there
into something new”[Design Anthropology – When opposites attract,]  .  This involves ethnographic observation and recognising one’s own place in entering into a situation you intend to study and then formulating a design outcome that engages with an incident from this enthnography.

I think that this process reconstructs the design process in a fundamental way.  As one is doing an anthropological study of a product, userability, cultural habit, space or service system it is beneficial to the outcome that it is not specified until analysis of information is performed.   This is because the social patterns that are drawn out may in fact divert the most efficient, viable and successful concept away from the orginial interest.  I mean that the research and development phase can become quite distinct rather than object driven.  Before concept design.

I am really interested in the idea of design anthropology in contemporary Western society as a way of cutting through the heady weight of hyper-consumerist, globalist, economic and marketing discourses which have constructed so much of our unsustainable ways of living.  I guess to make it about ways of living again, not constructions of symbols as a foreign and etheral discourse however as anchor points for meaning to the person and the way they live.

I have used a similar approach as a foreigner in projects in Vietnam and India however how you adapt that to a culture that is familiar is more complex.  You are trying to recognise your position as the outsider to something that is inherently inside, you are a very close part of this community.  A focus on difference will steer the project in the right way hopefully, whislt simultaneously observing with absolute tolerance, empathy and interest.

My research is storytelling of objects within the living room, and the way we associate with them as a function of time and space inherent to being human.  I am interviewing friends and family so identifying their environment without judgement has personal implications.  I think performing a self analysis is also important to recognise how my own construction of reality through objects will fundamentally impact my understanding of other peoples.

Perspective and reflection: Anthropology is about understanding the others point of view, trying to see the world through the eyes of the people studied .The anthropologist starts as an outsider, through fieldwork and participant observation s/he gradually obtains an insider perspective. From this combination of outsider and insider perspectives new understanding is born. Within participatory design the same process is happening in reverse. Through participation in the design activities and reflecting upon their own work practice users see themselves through the eyes of the designers hereby obtaining
an outsider perspective. From this combined insider and outsider perspective they are able to conceive new ideas for future work practices. Design anthropology is a point of view: Not our (the designers) point of view not their (the users) point of view, but an additional point of view, a double perspective. “   [www.nwow.alexandra.dk/publikationer/Design_Anthropology.pdf]

→ Leave a CommentCategories: Cultural Comment · Design & Everyday life · Social Innovation · Theory · Visual Sociology · objects
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,